Election

May. 7th, 2010 08:16 am
annwfyn: (tarot-hanged man)
[personal profile] annwfyn
Right now, the election results are making me happy.

  • Jeremy Paxman is savaging anyone who will talk to him. He's such a fantastic human attack dog.


  • A hung parliament, as far as anyone can tell.


  • A Green MP, which makes me exceedingly happy.


  • The BNP vote dropped by 6% and they got nothing. The UKIP also got nothing.


  • The Conservatives are talking about constitutional reform, and this is the best chance we've got for PR in a generation.


About the only thing that is making me sad is that the Lib Dems actually lost seats. I'd been beginning to harbour faint hopes for Nick Clegg.

As a final note, I don't believe in telling anyone how to vote, but I have been thinking one thing tonight.

If you voted for the BNP or for the UKIP, I think that we probably may have a bad case of Irreconcilable Differences, and it might be for the best if you quietly remove me from your friends list. I shan't make a fuss (which is rare for me) and I shall just remove you back. I don't think this is likely to come up, but I wanted to say it.

Date: 2010-05-07 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] span1el.livejournal.com
And losing ground to Andrew Smith in Oxford East.

It's wierd. Everywhere I go in Oxford I see Lib Dem boards and posters up and almost nothing for Labour but on the day it went the other way.

That said, I did see a number of people with clip boards going house to house yesterday evening so I'm guessing this was elements of the Labour party drumming up the last bit of support they could.

I really can't see Cameron going for PR though. He'll either offer a referendum and campaign massively against it (more money available for that campaign than the Lib Dems) or just flat out refuse to give it away. It loses him too much power.

And while you feel down about the Lib Dems losing seats they did actually increase their share of the vote. It just didn't happen anywhere that would make a difference in the current system. To have 25% of the electoral vote but then to have around 8% of the seats in the commons is a continuing travesty.

Date: 2010-05-07 12:34 pm (UTC)
ext_20269: (mood - dandelion thoughts)
From: [identity profile] annwfyn.livejournal.com
That is something I agree with utterly. Labour had something like 29% of the vote. The Tories had around 36% of the vote. For this to turn into the seat distribution in the way it did is just utterly ridiculous and makes a mockery of the notion of our democracy.

We need electoral reform and we need it now.

Date: 2010-05-07 12:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adze.livejournal.com
My friend Nick crunched some numbers this morning on what PR would have resulted in:

Party Votes Actual Seats PR Seats
Cons 10,035,618 288 223
Labour 8,024,022 241 178
LibDem 6,361,341 51 141
UKIP 858,484 0 19
BNP 631,907 0 14
SNP 482,000 6 11
Green 262,000 1 6
DUP 168,000 8 4
P Cymru 165,000 4 3
S Fein 150,000 4 3
SDLP 107,000 3 2
Allianc 42,000 1 1

From: [identity profile] lanfykins.livejournal.com
Same way everyone else does, I guess; they get people to vote for them :)

But you're right, it would be harder for them.

I guess there isn't actually a system that's fair on everyone.

Date: 2010-05-07 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lanfykins.livejournal.com
To have 25% of the electoral vote but then to have around 8% of the seats in the commons is a continuing travesty.

Absolutely. It disenfranchises almost a quarter of the voters in Britain.

Profile

annwfyn: (Default)
annwfyn

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 10th, 2026 11:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios