On privilege
Sep. 15th, 2008 01:12 pmI saw a really good article on privilege linked to from a community I'm on earlier, and thought it was worth sharing. It's here and it's a really nice and concise article explaining a load of stuff that I think I sometimes stumble over.
Basically, the gist is that you're all privileged. Yes. You.
For starters, you live in the western world. You wake up in the morning, and you know that when you clean your teeth, the water you are using isn't going to kill you. Unless you chose not to, you know that you can eat that day. And then we move on to the other privileges that all of us have at least some of - able bodied privilege, cis-gender privilege, white privilege, male privilege. It's an interesting read and I think well worth poking.
In other news, I'm getting vexed with myself over my sleeping patterns. Last night I couldn't get to sleep until 2.30 am, and then nearly died getting up at 8.30 am. Today is my day off, so I wound up going back to bed around 10 am and then just sleeping until gone noon, which I really don't like in myself.
I need to sort out my sleeping patterns. And I need to somehow do it now.
Basically, the gist is that you're all privileged. Yes. You.
For starters, you live in the western world. You wake up in the morning, and you know that when you clean your teeth, the water you are using isn't going to kill you. Unless you chose not to, you know that you can eat that day. And then we move on to the other privileges that all of us have at least some of - able bodied privilege, cis-gender privilege, white privilege, male privilege. It's an interesting read and I think well worth poking.
In other news, I'm getting vexed with myself over my sleeping patterns. Last night I couldn't get to sleep until 2.30 am, and then nearly died getting up at 8.30 am. Today is my day off, so I wound up going back to bed around 10 am and then just sleeping until gone noon, which I really don't like in myself.
I need to sort out my sleeping patterns. And I need to somehow do it now.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:25 pm (UTC)Do people think it means "rich fop" or something?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:36 pm (UTC)If I were to come from humble beginnings, and without the luxury of expensive education struggle to get a well-paid job, so I could raise my children in such a way that they had a life of privilege, who would they have to repay that to?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:39 pm (UTC)Person 1: You have male privilege.
Person 2: What do you mean, I'm privileged? I was raised in total poverty and used to work 26 hours per day down a mine pit, before walking barefoot over broken glass back to the iron maiden where I slept. I'm not privileged.
Person 1: I didn't say you were privileged in all areas. You didnt have class privilege, which Tarquin over there blatantly does...
Tarquin: Whatho! I was raised in a palace, you know? And what is this thing called work?
Person 1:..anyway. As I was saying. You didn't have class privilege. You did and do have male privilege, which means that certain things are easier because you're a bloke - you don't have people dismiss your emotions as being 'well, just that time of the month', you can have kids without it messing with your career, no one will look at you funny at job interviews in case you do have kids, and the odds of you facing sexual or domestic violence are much much smaller.
Person 2: BUT I WALKED OVER BROKEN GLASS!
Person 1: Yes. But that's not the same as being a woman.
Person 2: BROKEN GLASS! AND THERE WAS THIS ONE TIME WE HAD TO EAT COAL FOR DINNER.
Tarquin: Gosh, that does sound rather like Eton. Does that mean I'm not privileged either?
Person 1: I think I'm losing the will to live.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:42 pm (UTC)I would hope in your case that your kids would be grateful to you for giving them the class privilege they enjoy, but also aware that they were given that and didn't have to work for it. Furthermore, they would probably have some privileges that you didn't work for either - they would be white, maybe male, hopefully able bodied. Those are privileges they just kinda acquired and it would be nice if they wanted to help change the world so that those who were not born with those gifts would still have access to all the good stuff that comes from it.
Does that sort of make sense?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:43 pm (UTC)I eat well, live in a country without extreme laws over my body, a free health care system and a system that looks after you when you are unemployed. I'm not priviledged in other areas, such as my sex and the fact that I am mentally ill.
I don't get what's so wrong with admitting that.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:43 pm (UTC)Sleeping Patterns...
Date: 2008-09-15 12:45 pm (UTC)I don't know if it was the post gaming come-down, where I frequently don't sleep properly after a gaming weekend - my brain just doesn't shut down for ages on a Sunday night - how bright it was last night, or anything else, but it was a real struggle.
And this doesn't help when you wake up at 6 to start waking up for work.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:46 pm (UTC)I think I've met Tarquin before. Honestly, I have this horrible feeling I've been Tarquin before. I was totally raised with privilege of all sorts - class privilege, western privilege, white privilege, able bodied privilege - and I think it wasn't that fun saying 'yeah - I was totally a spoilt brat'.
Part of what made it kinda hard for me was that a load of my adolescence, in particular, was really miserable, with Mum dying etc. It was kinda tough to look at time of complete suffering and say "gee...I was lucky".
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:54 pm (UTC)however, I think it is important to reiterate that there is a difference in acknowlegdement of Priv's and becoming an apologist regarding them.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:54 pm (UTC)I've been told I'm racist because I have a white father, which is just stupid.
If they had said "you are priviledged because you look sort of white" I might have understood.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 01:05 pm (UTC)I'm not joking.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 01:06 pm (UTC)What I don't get is how you (she/they/whatever) can say that on the one hand having privilege doesn't carry the responsibility of guilt, but on the other hand having privilege does carry the responsibility of having to make restitution.
It strikes me as saying "don't feel guilty for having privilege, feel guilty for not using it to fulfil my political objectives".
o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 01:10 pm (UTC)Essentially, from my point of view, trying to do the right thing by other people and trying to make sure everyone has access to some of the benefits of privilege is a bit like bending over to help someone in the street after someone else has just kicked them to the kerb. Just on a larger level. If someone walks past in front of me, saying loudly "well, I didn't kick them to the kerb. Not my problem", then I won't think 'damn them for not being on that kerb', but I may well think 'christ - why the hell didn't that w*nker do anything to help'.
I think that's the kind of feel that's meant to be engendered by the 'don't feel guilty about having privilege, feel guilty about perpetuating it' line.
Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:13 pm (UTC)Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:14 pm (UTC)Honestly, it's like the dregs of the gene pool.
....
Date: 2008-09-15 01:14 pm (UTC)Apologistic reaction to the knowledge of those same priv's leads in me at least, to feelings of guilt, of shame and or/ a tendancy to reject the knowledge as it feels too huge to accomodate, to change. To better the world. So, apologists also tend to accept Blame. Which I do not, an example would be any discussion regarding slavery. I accept my cultural heritage regarding the issue, personally condemn it and would seek to end it were it present in the Now. However, it isn't in that I am not personally involved in people trafficking, nor have a ethnic-minority house slave at my beck and call, dependant on my good feelings towards them.
I am not responsible for what was done, and I will not be held personally responsible. 1
That is merely an example however.
Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:14 pm (UTC)I don't think I've ever been served first in the chip shop. The Laws Of Queue forbid it and I refuse to believe that any upstanding English chip shop owner would break The Laws Of Queue for any reason! My world couldn't cope with that concept.
Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:18 pm (UTC)Another one of his arguments is that women can, at any time, claim "women's problems" and be let off anything. This includes walking out of meetings, and you will never be disciplined for anything you do as long as you claim "women's problems".
Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:19 pm (UTC)Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:20 pm (UTC)Wizards do exist.
Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:20 pm (UTC)Wow. Are they EVER going to learn that not everything is about their penises?
Re: o_O
Date: 2008-09-15 01:23 pm (UTC)Honestly, 14 people (not all women) pointing out how wrong he was, and he didn't get it.